[GRASS-dev] r.slope.aspect with -n flag giving aspect of flat areas as -9998
Pedro Venâncio
pedrongvenancio at gmail.com
Fri Jan 31 01:38:54 PST 2020
Hi Anna and Markus,
Thank you very much!
A filled a ticket: https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/issues/319
Best regards,
Pedro
Markus Metz <markus.metz.giswork gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta,
30/01/2020 à(s) 08:26:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:50 PM Pedro Venâncio <pedrongvenancio gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I was testing r.slope.aspect with the "new" -n flag, also to include -e
> and -n flags in QGIS Processing, but -n flag is giving aspect values of
> flat areas as -9998, instead of -9999, when the precision choosed is CELL,
> and the output data type is CELL.
>
> that seems to be a rounding error, even though float or double should be
> able to represent -9999 exactly. Should be easy to fix.
>
> Markus M
> >
> > https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.slope.aspect.html
> >
> > I've tested with GRASS 7.6 (on Linux) and GRASS 7.8.2 (on Windows), both
> in the GUI and CLI.
> >
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:19:40 2020)
>
> > r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS
> precision=CELL
> > Percent complete...
> > Elevation products for mapset <PERMANENT> in <SRTM_PT_25m>
> > Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 360.0000
> > Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS> complete
> > Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
> > Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS> complete
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:20:24 2020) Comando terminado (43 sec)
> >
> > r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS PERMANENT
>
> >
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS@ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:20:24
> 2020 |
> > | Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator:
> PedroVenancio |
> > | Location: SRTM_PT_25m
> |
> > | DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78
> |
> > | Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
> |
> > | Timestamp: none
> |
> >
> |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > |
> |
> > | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
> |
> > | Data Type: CELL
> |
> > | Rows: 23200
> |
> > | Columns: 11360
> |
> > | Total Cells: 263552000
> |
> > | Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
> |
> > | N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
> |
> > | E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
> |
> > | Range of data: min = -9998 max = 360
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Data Source:
> |
> > | raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> |
> > |
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Data Description:
> |
> > | generated by r.slope.aspect
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Comments:
> |
> > | aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> |
> > | zfactor = 1.00
> |
> > | min_slope = 0.000000
> |
> > |
> |
> > | r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation="SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT"
> slo\ |
> > | pe="SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS"
> aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRAS\ |
> > | S" format="degrees" precision="CELL" zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
> |
> > |
> |
> >
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:26:09 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)
>
> >
> >
> > Using the default precision as FCELL, all goes ok:
> >
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:33:08 2020)
>
> > r.slope.aspect -e -n --verbose elevation=SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> slope=SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2 aspect=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2
> > Percent complete...
> > Elevation products for mapset <PERMANENT> in <SRTM_PT_25m>
> > Min computed aspect 0.0000, max computed aspect 359.8096
> > Aspect raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2> complete
> > Min computed slope 0.0000, max computed slope 75.2970
> > Slope raster map <SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2> complete
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:34:01 2020) Comando terminado (53 sec)
> >
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:34:27 2020)
>
> > r.info map=SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_2 PERMANENT
>
> >
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | Map: SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GRASS_ Date: Tue Jan 28 11:34:01
> 2020 |
> > | Mapset: PERMANENT Login of Creator:
> PedroVenancio |
> > | Location: SRTM_PT_25m
> |
> > | DataBase: D:\ICNF\Modelos_Combustivel_2018\Landscape_File\grass78
> |
> > | Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
> |
> > | Timestamp: none
> |
> >
> |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> > |
> |
> > | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 360
> |
> > | Data Type: FCELL
> |
> > | Rows: 23200
> |
> > | Columns: 11360
> |
> > | Total Cells: 263552000
> |
> > | Projection: ETRS89 / Portugal TM06
> |
> > | N: 278000 S: -302000 Res: 25
> |
> > | E: 164000 W: -120000 Res: 25
> |
> > | Range of data: min = -9999 max = 359.8097
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Data Source:
> |
> > | raster elevation file SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> |
> > |
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Data Description:
> |
> > | generated by r.slope.aspect
> |
> > |
> |
> > | Comments:
> |
> > | aspect map elev = SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT
> |
> > | zfactor = 1.00
> |
> > | min_slope = 0.000000
> |
> > |
> |
> > | r.slope.aspect --verbose -e -n elevation="SRTM_PT_25m PERMANENT"
> slo\ |
> > | pe="SRTM_PT_25m_Slope_Deg_GRASS_2"
> aspect="SRTM_PT_25m_Aspect_Std_GR\ |
> > | ASS_2" format="degrees" precision="FCELL" zscale=1.0 min_slope=0.0
> |
> > |
> |
> >
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > (Tue Jan 28 11:34:28 2020) Comando terminado (0 sec)
> >
> >
> > The elevation map I'm using is this one:
> > https://www.fc.up.pt/pessoas/jagoncal/srtm/SRTM_PT_25m.tif
> >
> > As CELL is a 32 bit integer with a range from -2,147,483,647 to
> +2,147,483,647, -9999 should be fine to conform inside it.
> >
> > Another issue I see is in r.info, that is showing the title as
> >
> > | Title: Aspect counterclockwise in degrees from east
> >
> > which is not correct in this case, as the -n flag was used.
> >
> > Could these be bugs?
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Pedro Venâncio
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-dev mailing list
> > grass-dev lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>
-------------- próxima parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20200131/abcb16f5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list