[GRASS-dev] GitHub backport label proposal
Nicklas Larsson
n_larsson at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 3 11:46:13 PST 2022
Markus,
Please go ahead with new labels for backport, let’s start with “backport [branch name]”. If it becomes too noisy, it is easy to change (ie. the label names).
Best, Nicklas
> On 22 Nov 2022, at 21:40, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:
>
>
> Le 22/11/2022 à 19:51, Nicklas Larsson a écrit :
>> Looks like a clever little bot. In case that is the way the community choose to go then the label will have to be “backport releasebranch_8_2”, which is very long…
>> I also wonder how useful it would be at the moment for GRASS, e.g. wide ranging indentation changes often causes conflicts between main and latest release branches.
>
> Sure the bot just tries to git cherry-pick commits, and if they don't apply cleanly, it obviously fails, with reports like https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/50943#issuecomment-1322647971
>
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list