[GRASS-dev] GitHub backport label proposal

Nicklas Larsson n_larsson at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 3 11:46:13 PST 2022


Markus,

Please go ahead with new labels for backport, let’s start with “backport [branch name]”. If it becomes too noisy, it is easy to change (ie. the label names).

Best, Nicklas

> On 22 Nov 2022, at 21:40, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 22/11/2022 à 19:51, Nicklas Larsson a écrit :
>> Looks like a clever little bot. In case that is the way the community choose to go then the label will have to be “backport releasebranch_8_2”, which is very long…
>> I also wonder how useful it would be at the moment for GRASS, e.g. wide ranging indentation changes often causes conflicts between main and latest release branches.
> 
> Sure the bot just tries to git cherry-pick commits, and if they don't apply cleanly, it obviously fails, with reports like https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/50943#issuecomment-1322647971
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> 



More information about the grass-dev mailing list