Sorry, I transposed the links. The top link is the results using r.terraflow in r.landscape.evol, and the bottom link is the results using r.watershed, not vice versa. Also, I should note that these maps are the absolute value of the 10th year dem with smoothing enabled minus the 10th year dem with no smoothing.<br>
<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/3/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Isaac Ullah</b> <<a href="mailto:isaac.ullah@asu.edu">isaac.ullah@asu.edu</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p>Here are some additional results of testing between new version of r.watershed and r.terraflow. </p><p><u>Time costs:</u><br clear="all"></p><p>Map A (2.8 million cells), r.watershed is 52 seconds faster than r.terraflow</p>
<p>Map B (21 millions cells), r.watershed is 2 minutes 58 seconds faster than r.terraflow</p><p><u>Accuracy in r.landscape.evol simulations:</u></p><p>Maps produced using r.watershed for flowacc show realistic values of erosion and deposition <em>with no smoothing</em> after 10 model cycles(1 cycle = 1 sim year). The difference between smoothed and unsmoothed maps is at maximum only .5 meters, and the diffs are dispersed topographically. Image link: <a href="http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah/files/MEDLAND/smo_nosmo_diff_terraflw.png" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah/files/MEDLAND/smo_nosmo_diff_terraflw.png</a></p>
<p>Maps produced using r.terraflow for flowacc show spikes as high as +/- 96 meters (with no smoothing) after 10 model cycles. Spikes are concentrated in the channels, and diff between smoothed and un smoothed results also show anamolies are concetrated in the channels. Image link: <a href="http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah/files/MEDLAND/smo_nosmo_diff_rwshd.png" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah/files/MEDLAND/smo_nosmo_diff_rwshd.png</a></p>
<p>I am currently testing new r.watershed in a longterm model run (100 cycles) with no smoothing, and will report the results here. In r.lnadscape.evol for a 2.8 million cell map, the smoothing routine costs 23.5 seconds. Using new r.watershed with the smoothing turned on takes 1 minute 5.5 seconds. Without smoothing takes only 42 seconds. Using r.terraflow with smoothing takes 1 min 57 seconds. Using r.terraflow without smoothing takes 1 minute 33 seconds, but produces unusable results. Also, using r.watershed eliminates the need to run r.fill.dir before each model run--an additional time savings...<br>
</p><p>Cheers</p>-- <br><br>Isaac I Ullah, M.A.<br><br>Archaeology PhD Student,<br>ASU School of Evolution and Social Change<br><br>Research Assistant,<br>Mediterranean Landscape Dynamics Project<br>***************************************************<br>
<a href="mailto:isaac.ullah@asu.edu" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">isaac.ullah@asu.edu</a><br><a href="mailto:ullah@archaeologist.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">ullah@archaeologist.com</a><br>
<br><a href="http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah</a><br>
***************************************************
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>Isaac I Ullah, M.A.<br><br>Archaeology PhD Student,<br>ASU School of Evolution and Social Change<br><br>Research Assistant,<br>Mediterranean Landscape Dynamics Project<br>
***************************************************<br><a href="mailto:isaac.ullah@asu.edu">isaac.ullah@asu.edu</a><br><a href="mailto:ullah@archaeologist.com">ullah@archaeologist.com</a><br><br><a href="http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah">http://www.public.asu.edu/~iullah</a><br>
***************************************************