<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
I agree one word is better than two. Maybe just current. <br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Michael Barton</div>
<div>School of Human Evolution &Social Change</div>
<div>School of Complex Adaptive System Science</div>
<div>Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity</div>
<div>Arizona State University</div>
<div><br>
</div>
...Sent from my iPad</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Jan 15, 2021, at 9:35 PM, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:12 PM Michael Barton <<a href="mailto:Michael.Barton@asu.edu">Michael.Barton@asu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_-409664654182591886WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">You are correct about the redundancy. I was trying to make the change as minor as possible. A somewhat better listing would be<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>GRASS GIS 7.8.5 (current stable)<u></u><u></u></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="m_-409664654182591886_GRASS-GIS-old"></a><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>GRASS GIS 7.6.1 (legacy) [change from “old”]<u></u><u></u></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="m_-409664654182591886_GRASS-GIS-devel"></a><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>GRASS GIS 7.9 (preview) [“development” is OK, but “preview” sounds more inviting for use]<u></u><u></u></b></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>+1 for legacy and especially preview, I like that a lot!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'm unsure about "current stable". It seems like one of the works might be enough. I thought stable should be enough, but PostgreSQL actually uses Current in documentation just be itself. Isn't there a noun "release" implied in each of those? Aren't all
releases stable unless noted otherwise? Isn't then "stable" redundant? Anyway, I like the proposal even as is.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>