[GRASS-PSC] RFC1 vote reminder

[Scott Mitchell]

OK, then let's try again, we'll make it "really, really" passed,  
given how the first vote went.

So please consider this a proposal to adopt RFC1 as it stands in CVS  
now (version 1.10).

Since we have split off the voting procedures into RFC3, and since  
I'm not proposing a concurrent vote on that (my sense is that it is  
still under discussion), I propose that this vote on RFC1 will be  
guided by the draft guidelines in RFC3 as of right now, i.e. CVS  
version 1.2.  In other words, as long as we get a vote of +2, no  
vetos, and no more accidental procedural mess-ups by Thursday, 5  
April 1600 EDT (2000 GMT), I think we will finally have an agreed  
upon RFC1.

Also please consider this my vote of +1.

Thanks!

Scott

On 1 Apr 2007, at 01:42, Hamish wrote:

> Scott:
>> So... given all that, I've gone ahead and committed the changes, and
>> my read of the discussion is that it's ready for vote, but to avoid
>> repeating mistakes and also to avoid the "double affirmation" that
>> would be caused by polling to see if everyone thinks it is ready for
>> a vote (!), I'll ask now for anyone that thinks it is NOT ready to
>> pipe up.  If nobody does in the next day or so, if I get online late
>> tomorrow I'll call the vote, but anyone else should also feel free to
>> do so, as far as I'm concerned.
>
> I have just fixed in CVS a Doxygen mistake introduced by my previous
> patch: \ref is used to make hyperlinks to other sections, not \link
> \endlink (which is used to connect to other documents).
>
> With that, I am happy with the state of the RFC1 draft.
>
>
>
> Hamish