[GRASS-PSC] Re: GRASS CVS to SVN migration: your agreement to 'GRASS RFC 2: Legal aspects of code contributions' needed

[roberto.antolin at polimi.it]

Hi all,
I agree too

Regards,
Roberto.

Quoting Martin Landa:

> I agree to 'GRASS RFC 2: Legal aspects of code contributions'.
>
> Martin Landa
>
> 2007/12/6, Markus Neteler:
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> as part of the OSGeo incubation we need to formally establish a code of
>> conduct for committers so that you are clear on what are legitimate
>> contributions and what are not within the GRASS project. We (the GRASS
>> Project Steering Committee) want to ensure that you are familiar with
>> the guidelines:
>>
>>  GRASS RFC 2: Legal aspects of code contributions
>>  http://mpa.itc.it/markus/grass63progman/rfc/rfc2_psc.html
>>  Status: Adopted
>>
>> This transition to SVN is a good opportunity to get this specific
>> feedback from each committer indicating that s/he agreed to the
>> guidelines. It is already a requirement since the GRASS-PSC
>> exists but was not yet applied to long-term committers.
>>
>> Note: A confirmation email is fine stating that you agree to
>>   'GRASS RFC 2: Legal aspects of code contributions'.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Markus Neteler
>> GRASS PSC chair
>>
>
>
> --
> Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa *
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>