[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] too many branches => retirement GRASS6.5.svn (=develbranch6)

[Helmut Kudrnovsky]

Markus Metz-3 wrote
> Since the code base of devbr6 and relbr6 is largely identical,
> the same fix can be applied to both branches which is not a lot of
> work.
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list

> grass-psc at .osgeo

> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

are you sure devbr6 and relbr6 are largely identical? 

if yes what's the benefit (for users and devs) to have both, when the focus
on grass7 development/improvement would be a desired target ?

if no what should be ported (from users' and devs'-view) from devbr6 to
relbr6, when the focus on grass7 development/improvement would be a desired
target ?

as Martin mentioned on the ML, there aren't anymore nightly devbr6-wingrass
nightlies (osgeo4w/standalone).




-----
best regards
Helmut
--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/too-many-branches-tp5131993p5133711.html
Sent from the GRASS-PSC mailing list archive at Nabble.com.