[GRASS-PSC] RFC3: New voting rules

Markus Neteler neteler at osgeo.org
Sun Aug 17 12:37:55 PDT 2014


On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at ncsu.edu> wrote:
> although I am wondering whether there should be some clarification that in
>
> 5. it is 51% of the members voting on this particular proposal (meaning that a vote from all PSC members
> is not needed to pass a proposal)
>
> "5. A proposal will be accepted if it receives majority (51% including the proposer) of votes (+1) and no vetoes (-1)."
>
> while in
> 8. we are talking about all members of PSC which is clearly stated there.
>
> "8.If a proposal is vetoed, and it cannot be revised to satisfy all parties, then it can be resubmitted for an override vote in which a majority of all eligible voters indicating +1 is sufficient to pass it. Note that this is a majority of all committee members, not just those who actively vote."
>
> If I understood this correctly then I assume other understand it as well and no modification is needed.

Well, better be clear in the first place. To avoid future discussions
I have done some finetuning in the wording. For the changes, see
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/3_PSCVotingProcedures?action=diff&version=10&old_version=9

Hope it is more clear now.

Markus


More information about the grass-psc mailing list