[GRASS-PSC] RFC3: New voting rules

[Margherita Di Leo]

Hi,


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Martin Landa <landa.martin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2014-04-09 13:44 GMT+02:00 Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>:
> >>>> I second Helena on quorum (min 51%), and also +1 for the 7 days
> suggestion
> >>>> of MaDi.
> >>>
> >>> I would agree with that. Martin
> >>
> >> /me too.
> >> Perhaps we should draft an updated version in the Wiki?
> >
> > I updated RFC3 [1] accordingly, so
> >
> > * 4 -> 7 days
> > * A proposal will be accepted if it receives majority (51% including
> > the proposer) of votes +1 and no vetoes (-1).
> >
> > Feedback welcome.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/3_PSCVotingProcedures
>
> Thanks.
>
> I wonder about this phrase:
>
> "The PSC Chair gets a vote."
>
> Did a word get lost?
> If not, perhaps change to ... "committee members including the PSC Chair."
> ?
>
> Markus
>
> PS: minor changes in
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/3_PSCVotingProcedures?action=diff&version=6&old_version=5


I just updated the 4 business days -> 7 days also in the "introduction"
paragraph.
I express my +1 for the approval of the current version.

Thanks,
Margherita

-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-leo at jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20140621/6c7b72df/attachment.html>