[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

Scott Mitchell smitch at me.com
Tue Jan 6 17:43:33 PST 2015

Since I'm in there anyway editing a couple of minor grammatical fixes, I've deleted that sentence based on this latest exchange plus the fact that it makes sense to me. But I'm doing so in the comfort of knowing that my edits can be easily reverted, so don't hesitate if there's reason.

> On Jan 6, 2015, at 05:35, Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> On 06/01/15 11:25, Martin Landa wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 2014-12-30 0:29 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>:
>>>> I agree with Maris that no feedback should be interpreted as agreement.
>> I would also agree with that. It would be reasonable also to set some
>> deadline for discussion and then to propose voting. What do you think?
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=7&old_version=6
>> I did cosmetics changes [1].
>>> I found that a "tbd" is still there.
>> I would suggest to simply delete this sentence. Creating extra branch
>> for such purpose seems to be not necessary to me. Any opinion on that?
> +1
> Moritz
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20150106/0ef58985/attachment.html>

More information about the grass-psc mailing list