[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] RFC4 discussion call

Markus Neteler neteler at osgeo.org
Wed Jan 7 13:20:32 PST 2015


On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Massimiliano Cannata
<massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch> wrote:
> Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me.

I agree. I updated its date now and expanded "RC" in the beginning.

http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure

Last doubts:

* Step1: .... "The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager)
then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support
for this proposal. "

--> this "sufficient" is still a bit elastic. If one developer is
against it, others in favour, it is fine to start? Leave it to
democratical debates? Just to be sure.

> Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is
> responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc.

That's the release manager. But I added that now (looks more dramatic
than it is, trac doesn't highlight well this time).:

http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=16&old_version=13

... makes sense?

Markus


More information about the grass-psc mailing list