[GRASS-PSC] git migration
Anna Petrášová
kratochanna at gmail.com
Wed Mar 27 06:30:23 PDT 2019
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:48 AM Margherita Di Leo <diregola at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:59 PM Veronica Andreo <veroandreo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I opened a thread for discussion about labels and priorities for issues
>> in the RFC, but there was not so much interest apparently [1]. I still
>> believe that we should keep
>> raster(3d), vector, temporal and so on as components. I think those are
>> useful and make search easier. Modules is maybe too general, IMO.
>>
>
I agree, although with raster, vector etc it's not quite clear if it should
refer to modules or libraries or both. Also don't forget labels work
differently than trac categories.
I would also add 'Mac specific', (I don't think we need also Linux
specific) and maybe just shorten it to 'MacOS' and 'Windows'.
Also I would add a label 'beginner'.
Anna
> I tend to agree with Vero.
> Cheers,
>
>>
>> my 0.2 cents
>> Vero
>>
>> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2019-March/091584.html
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Margherita Di Leo
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20190327/82e9949f/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-psc
mailing list