[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS GIS Elections 2020] Current members of the PSC willing to stand up for reelection?

[Helena Mitasova]

I agree with #2 - the current PSC members should be nominated for re-election by member(s) of the community- this is consistent with the OSGeo election procedure. 

We should also make sure that the nominee agrees to be nominated, 

Helena

> On Dec 22, 2020, at 8:48 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS
> GIS election 2020 <variablestarlight at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
> ...
>>>> But I agree with Hernán that we should have discussed this earlier.
>>> Still it is not too late, say, "nothing lost".
>> 
>> Marcus, what do you say on this?
> 
> What I tried to say is that we might quickly modify our procedure to
> Helli's suggestion as no PSC member had answered yet (hence, no
> conflict arises so far).
> 
>> What do other PSC members say? Shall
>> the PSC make a consensus on these proposals? In that case it would be
>> nice to have the matter resolved rather sooner than later.
> 
> Definitely.
> 
> @PSC: do you agree to change our procedure to
> 
> "GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same
> way by the community as possible new candidates"
> 
> ?
> 
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc

Helena Mitasova
Professor at the Department of Marine, 
Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
Associate director and faculty fellow at the Center for Geospatial Analytics
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
hmitaso at ncsu.edu

"All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.”