[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS GIS Elections 2020] Current members of the PSC willing to stand up for reelection?

[Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election 2020]

Thank you Margherita and Peter.

I can now count 7 votes in favor of the proposal (Markus, Moritz, Anna, 
Helena, Margherita, Peter and Michael) from a total of 9 possible.

I will then write this in the wiki and after that inform everyone on the 
lists:

"GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same 
way by the community as possible new candidates"

Have a nice Christmas Holidays everyone.

Hernán (CRO)

On 2020-12-23 09:25, Peter Löwe wrote:
> +1 for proposal #2: "GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for 
> re-election in the same
> way by the community as possible new candidates"
> Best,
> Peter
> <peter.loewe at gmx.de>
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 23. Dezember 2020 um 08:19 Uhr
> *Von:* "Chief Return Officer (CRO) - GRASS GIS election 2020" 
> <variablestarlight at gmail.com>
> *An:* "GRASS-PSC" <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [GRASS-PSC] [GRASS GIS Elections 2020] Current members 
> of the PSC willing to stand up for reelection?
> On 2020-12-22 17:43, Michael Barton wrote:
>
>     I have no issue with either proposal. I did not respond because I
>     never saw a notification, even though I was looking for it.
>
> If I counted correctly, it seems then that at this point we will need 
> one more PSC vote to approve proposal #2.
>
> "GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in the same
> way by the community as possible new candidates"
>
> Anyone?
>
> Hernán (CRO)
>
>         On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:48 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org
>         <mailto:neteler at osgeo.org>> wrote:
>         On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:34 PM Chief Return Officer (CRO) -
>         GRASS
>         GIS election 2020 <variablestarlight at gmail.com
>         <mailto:variablestarlight at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             On 2020-12-22 12:08, Markus Neteler wrote:
>
>                 On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM Moritz Lennert
>
>         ...
>
>                     But I agree with Hernán that we should have
>                     discussed this earlier.
>
>                 Still it is not too late, say, "nothing lost".
>
>
>             Marcus, what do you say on this?
>
>
>         What I tried to say is that we might quickly modify our
>         procedure to
>         Helli's suggestion as no PSC member had answered yet (hence, no
>         conflict arises so far).
>
>             What do other PSC members say? Shall
>             the PSC make a consensus on these proposals? In that case
>             it would be
>             nice to have the matter resolved rather sooner than later.
>
>
>         Definitely.
>
>         @PSC: do you agree to change our procedure to
>
>         "GRASS GIS PSC members are to be nominated for re-election in
>         the same
>         way by the community as possible new candidates"
>
>         ?
>
>         Markus
>         _______________________________________________
>         grass-psc mailing list
>         grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>         https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!LXnc6cuCYMYT1IyIMAPQJ9fyf7msoxybE0_ekbTQIbJHMx8vCcfIl-5hyOavwxwa7AcwZNw$
>
> _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list 
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org 
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc 
> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20201223/cb0144b9/attachment-0001.html>