[GRASS-PSC] Proposing Tomas Zigo as a new core developer

[Anna Petrášová]

Definitely +1

I would suggest with any new core devs we should have a policy that all
their PRs go through at least 1 review for some time. This policy would be
nice for all PRs (even from current devs), because it significantly
improves the code, but of course it's not always possible or practical
given the workload.

Anna

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:17 PM Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> Dear PSC,
>
> Let me propose Tomáš Zigo (https://github.com/tmszi) to be accepted as
> a core developer.
>
> Tomáš has impressively contributed to various parts of the source code:
>
> - in "core": as of today 132 accepted pull requests in the main repo [1],
> - in "addons": as of today 132 accepted pull requests in addons [2],
> - and he offered many more comments on other pull requests and as well
> as in the mailing list.
>
> I have asked him off-list and he would be happy to join the core team
> with write access to the main repository.
>
> According to RFC1 [1] all PSC members need to vote in a separate motion.
>
> Best,
> Markus
>
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+author%3Atmszi
> [2]
> https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+author%3Atmszi
> [3]
> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/1_ProjectSteeringCommitteeGuidelines
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20201121/3183e538/attachment-0001.html>