[GRASS-PSC] [GRASS-dev] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8
Veronica Andreo
veroandreo at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 10:44:44 PST 2021
Dear Nicklas,
Thanks much for such a clearly written RFC! I only made very minor cosmetic
changes.
Are there any other comments, objections or suggestions? Or further aspects
to be discussed?
If no, maybe we can vote on it soon-ish, no?
Have a nice weekend :)
Vero
El mar, 16 feb 2021 a las 15:36, Nicklas Larsson via grass-psc (<
grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>) escribió:
> I added the RFC draft to GRASS Wiki [1].
>
> Well, it's only a draft, so any thoughts, modifications, additions are
> most welcome!
>
> Nicklas
>
>
> [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/7_LanguageStandardsSupport
>
>
>
> On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 14:34:44 CET, Moritz Lennert <
> mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Am 11. Februar 2021 13:29:10 MEZ schrieb Nicklas Larsson <
> n_larsson at yahoo.com>:
> > Moritz,
> >
> >I'd be honoured!
> >I will put it on GRASS Wiki [1] if you don't have another suggestion and
> notify here when done.
>
>
> Great, thanks a lot !
>
>
> Moritz
>
> >
> >[1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, 11 February 2021, 12:54:30 CET, Moritz Lennert <
> mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/02/21 13:16, Nicklas Larsson wrote:
> >> It would be most favourable for all contributors and the project if the
> >> community could come to an agreement on this topic. I see no reason to
> >> postpone a decision on this much longer.
> >>
> >> The final word on this need to be that of the PSC's. Whether through
> >> simple vote or a RFC. However, a sounding of the opinion of the
> >> dev-community on this matter is of equal importance and can be of help
> >> for the PSC.
> >
> >Thanks a lot, Nicklas, for this very comprehensive summary !
> >
> >A suggestion made at the first meeting of the new PSC was to use this
> >discussion as a use case for a more extensive usage of RFC's to put
> >important decisions into more permanent documents than mailing list
> >archives and to provoke a formal decision as you suggest. Would you be
> >willing to write a first draft of such an RFC ?
> >
> >Moritz
> >
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20210226/e28a7b9f/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-psc
mailing list