[GRASS-PSC] GRASS DOI

[Huidae Cho]

All,

I agree with Peter. +1 for ORCIDs.

Best,
Huidae

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:23 AM Peter Löwe <peter.loewe at gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm not part of the PSC but would like to strongly encourage to
> include ORCIDs.
> Once this is achieved, credit for each following GRASS release will
> automatically be transferred to all ORCID accounts in the commiters list.
> Commiters without an ORCID will still benefit from the citation options
> ("Cite as") on the GRASS landing page at Zenodo.
>
> Seems like none of the other OSGeo projects using DOI has implemented that
> (except for an early proof of content for the ploewe/MOSS github repo ->
> https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4931427 :-) ).
> Could be another first for the GRASS project !
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
> <peter.loewe at gmx.de>
>
>
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2022 um 14:28 Uhr
> *Von:* "Veronica Andreo" <veroandreo at gmail.com>
> *An:* "Vaclav Petras" <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* "GRASS-PSC" <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [GRASS-PSC] GRASS DOI
>
>
> El jue, 13 ene 2022 a las 3:19, Vaclav Petras (<wenzeslaus at gmail.com>)
> escribió:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:40 PM Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> FYI: GDAL started just today to generate a Zenodo entry. Even took the
>>> top 16 commiters [3] according to GitHub and created a .zenodo.json
>>> file to control authorship:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/5101/files
>>
>>
>> .zenodo.json or CITATION.cff both should work now with Zenodo.
>> CITATION.cff is new, but it works as far as I know. .zenodo.json allows you
>> to set some Zenodo specific info. CITATION.cff is picked by other systems
>> such as GitHub or FAIR systems. We could generate one from the other (that
>> was recommended practice before Zenodo started to support CITATION.cff.
>>
>> In case we generate the file from the existing contributors.csv, we can
>> generate both. Adding ORCiDs there would be nice.
>>
>
> +1 for adding ORCiD for those that have it
>
>
>>
>> Is contributors.csv or starting a new list with the GitHub committers
>> like what GDAL did more appropriate?
>>
>
> Maybe a new one is better. It will probably also depend if we want to list
> all ppl in the contributors.csv or the main xx as in gdal.
>
> Vero
> _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>


-- 
Huidae Cho, Ph.D., GISP, /hidɛ <http://ipa-reader.xyz/?text=hid%C9%9B>
t͡ɕo/, 조희대, 曺喜大
GRASS GIS Developer
https://idea.isnew.info/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20220113/ac67f12e/attachment-0001.html>