[GRASS-PSC] [OSGeo-Discuss] Mailing lists to discourse migration

[Veronica Andreo]

Hi all,

After reading all the emails on this topic (which funnily enough are split
here and there and not in the same thread), I think there's no rush to
decide. I have put it on the agenda for our February PSC meeting.

What Luca says sounds interesting if indeed it allows people to get
everything on the mailing list and answer from there. In general, however,
I tend to agree with Markus that we should avoid too much fragmentation. In
the end, it's only a bunch of us usually answering over already too many
platforms.

Anyway, let's see how this evolves for projects already in discourse and
discuss the topic during our next meeting. What do you think?

Have a great entrance to 2024! Cheers!

Vero

El sáb, 30 dic 2023 a las 12:23, Luca Delucchi via grass-psc (<
grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org>) escribió:

>
>
> Il sab 30 dic 2023, 13:50 Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> ha scritto:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 10:50 AM Luca Delucchi via grass-psc
>> <grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>> > For what I can see with the discourse instance of OpenStreetMap where
>> we created a category for Italian
>> > discussion there are only pros to have discourse instead mailman since:
>> > - people used to use mailing list can continue to answer via email
>> > - people used to write via forum con use this way
>> > - archive is searchable
>>
>> (my answer copied also here from osgeo-discuss list)
>>
>> Just to add to the options we (theoretically) have:
>>
>> With an upgrade from mailman-2 to mailman-3 we could also have a
>> searchable archive. See for example:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
>> which (not surprisingly) looks much more modern than the old mailman-2 on
>> OSGeo.
>>
>
> Yes right, mailman-3 and discourse seems to have the same features but SAC
> (I have no idea why) choose  Discourse
>
>
>> Markus
>>
>
> Ciao
> Luca
>
>> _______________________________________________
> grass-psc mailing list
> grass-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-psc/attachments/20231231/95bf63f0/attachment.htm>