No subject

lists-owner at lists-owner at
Fri Mar 6 03:38:09 EST 1992

***** UNDELIVERABLE MAIL sent to roberto, being returned by itnsg1!roberto *****
mail: Error # 2 'Problem with mailfile' encountered on system itnsg1

Received: from by itnsg1.  via SMTP (911016.SGI/910805.SGI)
	for roberto id AA16926; Fri, 6 Mar 92 09:37:55 +0100
Received: from by with SMTP id AA05506
  (5.65d/IDA-1.4.4 for <roberto at>); Fri, 6 Mar 1992 02:17:11 -0600
Received: from by (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01447; Fri, 6 Mar 92 02:15:27 CST
Received: from by (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA24916; Fri, 6 Mar 92 02:15:27 CST
Return-Path: <hoffmann at>
Received: from ([]) by (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01441; Fri, 6 Mar 92 02:15:23 CST
From: hoffmann at
Received: by id AA04487; Fri, 6 Mar 92 09:14:51 +0100
Date: Wed, 6  Mar 92  8:05  01:00:00 +0000 (GMT)
Sender: lists-owner at
Reply-To: grassu-list at
Precedence: Bulk
Sender: lists-owner at
Reply-To: grassu-list at
Precedence: Bulk
To: grassu-list at
Cc: uigis-l at ubvm.bitnet
Reply-To: hoffmann at
In-Reply-To: <9203052108.AA22096(a)>
Message-Id: <920306090526:>
Subject: RE: Re: subscribe Ed Delisio

If you would call the subscribing account LISTSERV instead GRASSU-REQUEST
then it should be clear for the World that some kind of standardization
is used. As a cartographer I HAVE to use standardisized symbols on topo sheets
too and the World is understanding what is ment. This way I understand
userfriendly HCI's...
BTW, who of you in the GRASS-netland is using a TEKtronix (U/TekV)


| X.400:      <C=de;A=dbp;P=tu-dresden;OU=kartographie;OU=urzdfn;S=hoffmann> |

More information about the grass-user mailing list