No subject

grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil
Thu Aug 19 03:00:56 EDT 1993


***** UNDELIVERABLE MAIL sent to bonifaz, being returned by igiris!bonifaz *****
mail: Error # 8 'Invalid recipient' encountered on system igiris

Received: from max.cecer.army.mil by igiris via SMTP (911016.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for bonifaz) id AA12264; Thu, 19 Aug 93 00:00:40 -0700
Received: from amber.cecer.army.mil by max.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA18610
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 21:32:44 -0500
Received: from zorro.cecer.army.mil by amber.cecer.army.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA07100; Wed, 18 Aug 93 21:21:34 CDT
Received: from amber.cecer.army.mil by zorro.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA07578
  (5.67a/IDA-1.4.4 for <grassu-people at amber>); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 21:21:33 -0500
Received: from max.cecer.army.mil by amber.cecer.army.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA07094; Wed, 18 Aug 93 21:21:30 CDT
Received: from ulysses.sis.ualberta.ca by max.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA18518
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <grassu-list at max.cecer.army.mil>); Wed, 18 Aug 1993 21:21:30 -0500
Received: by ulysses.sis.ualberta.ca (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA20591; Wed, 18 Aug 1993 20:21:01 -0600
From: martin at ulysses.sis.ualberta.ca (Tim Martin)
Message-Id: <9308190221.AA20591 at ulysses.sis.ualberta.ca>
Subject: multiuser GRASS?
Sender: grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil
Reply-To: grassu-list at max.cecer.army.mil
Precedence: Bulk
Sender: grass-lists-owner at moon.cecer.army.mil.
Reply-To: grassu-list at moon.cecer.army.mil.
Precedence: Bulk
To: grassu-list at max.cecer.army.mil (GRASS Users)
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1993 20:21:00 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL17]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1106      

I recall some discussion last fall about whether GRASS can be 
used safely by more than one user at once, via Xterminals.  One
limitation discussed then was the problem of sharing xmonitors. 
But I think there were other concerns, about database integrity, 
etc.  Now that v4.1 is happily in place, I ask the question again:

  In principle, can GRASS be used as a multiuser X client?
  In practice, what precautions / changes must I take / make?
 
I'd be interested in any and all experiences people have had with
having more than one person use GRASS simultaneously on a single
computer.  And I'd really like to hear what the programmers have
to say about whether GRASS is or isn't designed to be a multiuser
package.

Tim.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------
  Tim Martin                     *    Canada, yes.  Mexico, yes.
  Spatial Information Systems    *    But in that little gap
  University of Alberta          *    in between, zippo.
  martin at ulysses.sis.ualberta.ca *                  - Bob Geldof
 ---------------------------------------------------------------





More information about the grass-user mailing list