Importing Elevation data from an ASCII format
Brian Culpepper
brian at cast.uark.edu
Thu Dec 9 16:39:17 EST 1993
Tom Nelson writes:>
>
> with a sites file then do either s.surf.idw or s.surf.tps.
> Both create a surface file but tps takes a lot longer and with possibly better results.
> then r.contour which produces a vector contour map of interpolated contours from the
> surface file.
------------------------------------------------
I will have to disagree with "do either s.surf.idw or s.surf.tps". These two
interpolation modules are NOT the same! If you are creating an elevation surface
then I believe s.surf.tps is the one to use, because all "sites" are equally
weighted, whereas ".idw" refers to inverse distance weighting. The ".idw" could
create unsatisfactory results. I suggest testing these two modules on a sample
dataset and comparing results.
A good reference is Helena Mitasova article in the Spring 1993 GRASSCLIPPINGS.
Hope this helps...
--
R. Brian Culpepper Research Assistant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (fax) 501 575-3846
Rm. 214 Ozark Hall (work) 501 575-6159
University of Arkansas brian at cast.uark.edu
Fayetteville, AR 72701
=====================================================================
All opinions are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies or the University of Arkansas.
More information about the grass-user
mailing list