problem with USGS DEM's
Cleavy GRASS mail
cleavy2 at earthlogic.baylor.edu
Tue Jan 11 14:17:06 EST 1994
Subject: problem with USGS DEM's
SOME of these USGS 1 degree x 1 degree DEM's have differing "C-numbers"
somewhere in their headers. SOME are read without any problem using
m.dem.extract
OTHERS, however, I have NEVER successfully read, either using m.dem.extract
OR m.dmaUSGS.read, etc.
Anybody have a solution to this COMMON problem?
---Cleavy McKnight
Dept. of Geology
Baylor University
Waco, TX 76798-7354
cleavy2 at earthlogic.baylor.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 94 16:19:43 CST
From: wang at cast.uark.edu (Wang Song)
Subject: Re: USGS dems into grass
Have you tryed to use command "m.dem.extract" to extract your DEMS ?
The command don't have to read from a tape drive, it could read from a
disk file. Usually, you could try blocksize of 4096 or 10240 when the GRASS
command ask for it. Your DEMS are 7.5 minute USGS DEMs, right ?
Song Wang
CAST/NCRI
> I have one of the ever-popular USGS dems here. It came from the Reston ftp site, and I want to bring it into Grass. I am specifically interested in hearing from someone who has already done this SUCCESSFULLY. I know that there must be someone out there who has.
>
> My attempts so far have been to use the commands m.dmaUSGSread and m.rot90 and r.in.ll. These have lead to unreadable, smeared DEMs. I have only been able to view the DEM after some row-col calculations, a new header, and the use of r.in.ascii. However, the file still needs to be rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise. So I'm still stuck.
>
> Please lend a hand and I'll summarize the info I get.
>
> Thanks. I'll give out any additional info I can if it's needed.
>
> -Eric
More information about the grass-user
mailing list