v.to.rast
martijn at scanner.frw.uva.nl
martijn at scanner.frw.uva.nl
Tue Mar 8 08:04:08 EST 1994
Assuming that Stefan didn't change the region parameters in between the
two displays, the only thing I can think of is that the first version
(created by v.to.rast) is uncompressed, while the second (created by
r.mapcalc) is compressed. Note that I didn't check this out...
Martijn van Leusen
On Mon, 7 Mar 1994, Stefan Jaeger wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to ask if someone else experienced the following problem. I
> digitized polygons and subsequently converted them to a cell map with
> v.to.rast. When I use d.rast to display the map, the display process is
> extremely slooooow. After performing the r.mapcalc operation r.mapcalc 'a=b'
> (just to produce a new map with the same values) the display process is much
> faster. Why is this?
>
> Stefan Jaeger currently at
> Dept. of Geography USGS
> University of Heidelberg National Center
> INF 348 Reston, VA 22092
> 69120 Heidelberg USA
> Germany
> stefan at geo0.geog.uni-heidelberg.de sjaeger at resdgs2.er.usgs.gov
>
> ********* sorry, no fancy name tag *********
>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list