Grass&Solaris:Solution????
James Darrell McCauley
mccauley at ecn.purdue.edu
Wed Oct 5 02:51:37 EDT 1994
"Marilyn Ruiz" (ruiz at thales.geog.ufl.edu) writes on 4 Oct 94:
>I've also had some hesitancy (unfounded?) about using gcc to compile
>GRASS on this machine. For me, the problem is not with the documentation
>for GRASS compilation, etc. I could use some reassurance that GRASS
>compiles as smoothly under one compiler as another. And I see the
>potential problems with installing gcc as more daunting than GRASS.
FWIW, I've found gcc to be a much better compiler than products
produced by SunSoft. It doesn't take more than one or two
instances of
bang head against terminal for days looking for bug;
break down and ask comp.lang.c or similar gurus for help;
only to hear
oh, looks like you've found bug #n in Sun's cc. Use gcc instead.
This was more true before cc was unbundled.
also FWIW, I've also seen binary distributions of gcc.
>I think overall, it's the issues peripheral to GRASS - Xwindows,
>compilers, graphics cards, operating systems - that have given
>me the most trouble, not GRASS, itself.
agreed. The alpha machine is a prime example.
>Marilyn Ruiz
>ruiz at thales.geog.ufl.edu
--Darrell
More information about the grass-user
mailing list