slope.aspect solution (maybe)
Grass package
grass at sun1.bham.ac.uk
Thu May 25 05:45:13 EDT 1995
> A few weeks ago I posted a message requesting help with a problem I was having
> with r.slope.aspect. When I used this command on a dem the resulting maps
> came out with linear areas of 0 slope in areas that should have contained
> relatively steep slopes. We'll, I think I found a solution (or at least a
> fudge).
>
> I did a reclass of all the areas that had 0 slope and turned them into
> areas of "no data." I then used r.surf.idw2 to interpolate the values for all
> the areas of no data. The resulting map seems much better than the original
> (although it is not perfect). Does anyone know if I violated any cardinal
> rules by doing this? If so, any other solutions?
>
> Bill Green
> wg1938 at cnsunix.albany.edu
>
Hi Bill,
You've hit upon a solution similar to the one I've used for a bad DEM.
However, if you do this on the Slope layer instead of on the DEM itself, I
think you are introducing errors. Try turning the DEM to 'no data' where
the Slope = 0, then re-interpolating the DEM and recalculating Slope from
that, and see if you end up with a better slope map. Of course, this
isn't going to be perfect either...
Martijn
P. Martijn van Leusen -------------------------------------------------------+
Leverhulme Research Fellow, The Wroxeter Hinterland Project |
University of Birmingham Field Archaeology Unit |
Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT |
Phone +44 121 414 5513 Fax +44 121 414 5516 E-mail P.M.van-Leusen at bham.ac.uk
More information about the grass-user
mailing list