MI SDTS format - Dragon Slayers Wanted (fwd)
Malcolm Williamson
malcolm at cast.uark.edu
Thu Dec 16 09:34:16 EST 1999
Hi, Michel
Thanks for your ongoing contributions. In my opinion, m.out.e00 would be
useful to a sizeable subset of GRASS users (including myself and my
cohorts here at CAST), but what we really all need are good shapefile
import/export capabilities, as, at least here in the US, shapefiles have
become almost a defacto standard for vector data (yuk!). v.in.shape is a
great start (thanks Frank!), but has some noteable limitations dealing
with polygon data (unless this has been remedied since I last looked at
it). Since my end goal is usually raster-based analysis in GRASS, the
majority of vector data that I'm interested in importing is
polygon-based.
I wish I were better able to assist in this area, but translators are
currently out of my league!
Best regards,
-Malcolm
Malcolm D. Williamson malcolm at cast.uark.edu
Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies Voice: 501-575-2734
12 Ozark Hall Fax: 501-575-5218
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville AR 72701
http://www.cast.uark.edu/
Michel Wurtz - ENGEES/CEREG wrote:
>
> Hello Frank and Rich,
>
> I'm not familiar with SDTS, but have worked with the people who developped
> EDIGeO, which is a french equivalent of SDTS. I presume that like any other
> Norm, this kind of data exchange format must take in account every little
> trick of every proprietary format, so it becomes a huge and unimplementable
> mess that is of course not widely used (high price and complexity of
> available implementations). I speak mainly about EDIGeO. I trust more
> SDTS because I believe US people are more pragmatic than French ones :-)
>
> Besides, I think the real problem with Grass vector format is the lack of
> a good database interface for storing and managing attributes data.
>
> I'm actually finishing (and hope to publish it for Christmas) a new
> version of m.in.e00 for Grass5.0 (some bug corrected, float
> grid format supported, and compressed format directly read).
> My only problem is "how to have a better attribute support than
> to spread all of them in a lot of cat files ?". Gdabse, MySQL or
> Postgress : what is the best for Grass community ?
> Is there an "official" answer from Baylor people ?
>
> I think that all of us who develop data translator programs must
> have the same approach and work together for the multiple attribute
> fields problem, and synchronize with Baylor development team.
>
> Any answer or suggestion ?
>
> BTW, I plan to write a v.out.e00 function : does this interest
> someone ? (apart Markus, who suggested this to me some... hmmm...
> months ago :-)
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Michel Wurtz ENGEES - CEREG
> 1, quai Koch - BP 1039, F-67070 STRASBOURG cedex
> Tel: +33 03.88.24.82.45 Fax: +33 03.88.37.04.97
More information about the grass-user
mailing list