[GRASSLIST:4638] Re: GRASS and Linux kernels

[Nigel McFarlane]

> You don't provide quite enough information to be sure, but it sounds
> like you've hit on a common misconception.

I'm familiar with expandable buffer caches. Your points are
goo, but in my case the dynamic management of that memory
wasn't being well handled by 2.4.7-10.  I was never concerned
that most of the memory was being used.  I stand by my
orginal remarks: I recommend upgrading.

so "never mind".

cheers, Nigel.