[GRASSLIST:4497] RE:Two questions: 1. r.param.scale; usage and etc... an error got into my last post!!

[Lars Forseth]

On Tuesday 10 September 2002 08:58, you wrote:
> Lars,
>
> I have been messing around with r.param.scale just recently and found the
> following. You can obtain more spatially extended classes if you play with
> the curvature tolerance. In my case, lowering the default c_tol value to
> 0.001 improved the output image nicely. Is it meangingfull to do this ? I
> don't know, I have not used those results yet hoping that somebody would
> comment on them first. Perhaps Jo Wood would like to answer this.
>

Hi!

Indeed, you were right, when I changed the c_tol parameter to 0.001 it gave 
much more meaningfull output!

Thanks

Regards

LarsF