[GRASSLIST:519] Re: layers for Digital Chart of the World

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Jun 25 04:57:44 EDT 2003


You probably all know about the quality controled GMT datasets?
They might provide a better base than DCW.

Bernhard
BTW: I still think posting HTML messages to the list is not polite.

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:16:30AM +0300, Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus wrote:
> 
>    Here is my opinion on the priority:
>    SeaShore
>    Country
>    Region
>    Water bodies (river/lakes/glaciars)
>    City (several layers to separate big citys from small ones
>    Other Human structres like Airports and Ports
>    Florests (is it possible ??)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20030625/b263c8af/attachment.bin


More information about the grass-user mailing list