[GRASSLIST:519] Re: layers for Digital Chart of the World
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Jun 25 04:57:44 EDT 2003
You probably all know about the quality controled GMT datasets?
They might provide a better base than DCW.
Bernhard
BTW: I still think posting HTML messages to the list is not polite.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:16:30AM +0300, Jorge Samuel Mendes de Jesus wrote:
>
> Here is my opinion on the priority:
> SeaShore
> Country
> Region
> Water bodies (river/lakes/glaciars)
> City (several layers to separate big citys from small ones
> Other Human structres like Airports and Ports
> Florests (is it possible ??)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20030625/b263c8af/attachment.bin
More information about the grass-user
mailing list