[GRASSLIST:1699] Re: GRASS binaries: why not?

[Buchan Milne]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Markus Neteler wrote:

> It's a valid point. We simply need more people for
> - updating the web pages
> - creating binary packages for various platforms (tar.gz)
> - create RPMs and debian packages

I have grass-5.0.3rc? packages, but I don't like to put more files up on
our web server than necessary, as we pay quite a bit for bandwidth, so I
stick to providing grass51/57 RPMs built from CVS weekly.

I could also provide grass53 cvs RPMS and grass5.0.3rc's, but I would
prefer it go somewhere else.

I will build grass-5.0.3 final for at least Mandrake 9.2, maybe 9.1 if
it is released when I still have a box I can test on, and make them
available on the free Mandrake Club mirrors.

I am currently running 5.0.3rc3 on my cooker box (just have been to busy
to try 5.0.3rc5 yet).

Regards,
Buchan

- --
|--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------|
Buchan Milne                Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work            +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering         http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key                   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/qlTWrJK6UGDSBKcRAjfcAKC5a/HDvbLIAzpYxYFruyM+Q3Cx7wCgxviI
qxp3WVtVJDGMaWZ07YmYNCY=
=Dh76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----