[GRASSLIST:6465] Re: Grass 6.0 on gentoo

Māris Nartišs maris.nartiss at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 09:37:34 EDT 2005


can this be mentioned in requirements file? In current version
(http://grass.itc.it/grass60/source/REQUIREMENTS.html) there is no
more notes about blas and lapack but they exist as configure options -
how then enduser can know that lapack (and blas too?) are optional and
unused nowdays?
And why the hell it needs LAPACK-3 not LAPACK-ATLAS if it doesnt get
used at all?!?


PS. I will fix things in grass ebuild when I will be done writing my
master work about paleohydrological modeling and GRASS GIS :)

On 4/14/05, Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0300, M?ris Narti?s wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is a ebuild in gentoo bug system.
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72353
> > I made it and it is working fine on my 3 Gentoo boxs :)
> > Only problem is with LAPACK. On Gentoo is a 2 LAPACKs - LAPACK-3.0 and
> > LAPACK-ATLAS. By default Gentoo should use LAPACK-CONFIG and it
> > installs LAPACK-ATLAS, but for me GRASS 6 fails to build with
> You don't need LAPACK at all (yet). It's an option which
> is not yet used within the GRASS code.
> So you may just simplify it.
> Markus

More information about the grass-user mailing list