[GRASSLIST:7823] Re: r.cost execution time
glynn at gclements.plus.com
Mon Aug 8 15:35:51 EDT 2005
[CC'd to development list.]
Ellen De Beuckeleer wrote:
> My cost layer contained some negative values. That's why the r.cost got
> into an infinite loop. I hope that by writing this here another newbe
> might not loose so much time...
Yeah, I can see how that could cause problems. I'm fairly sure that
r.cost assumes non-negative costs, although it should probably
actually check this.
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
More information about the grass-user