[GRASSLIST:5485] Re: GRASS image processing

[ncandade at mail.usf.edu]

>From my experience, I think ERDAS is much more easier to use, more user
friendly. If you are comfortable w/ GRASS its the way to go (much more
powerful), but ERDAS is more intuitive (the Field Guide/ manual is also
really good). Don't know much about ENVI !

> Dear Grasslisters,
>
> I'm going to do some image processing of Landsat and ASTER
> Images. I'm a bit confused, because everybody in my environment
> is using ErdasImagine. So, could anybody please tell me about
> the capabilities and possibilities, pertaining to Image Processing
> Tools, provided by GRASS in comparison to ErdasImagine or ENVI.
>
> Thank's a lot!
>
> With best regards,
>
> Grit
>
>
>
>
> --
> Grit Schuster, Environmental Scientist
>
> Department of Physical Geography
> Albert-Ludwigs Univeristy Freiburg
> Werderring 4
> D-79085 Freiburg
>
> phone: +49-(0)761-2039124
> fax: +49-(0)761-203-3596
> email: grit.schuster at geographie.uni-freiburg.de
> www: http://www.geographie.uni-freiburg.de/ipg/gkgl/gk.htm
>
>