[GRASSLIST:7460] Re: NVIZ compile error

Trevor Wiens twiens at interbaun.com
Tue Jul 5 12:27:58 EDT 2005


On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 16:33:05 +0100
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com> wrote:

> 
> [CC to developers]
> 
> Trevor Wiens wrote:
> 
> > I've finally decided to move to 6.0 from the 6.0 beta2. When compiling
> > I get a complaint about nviz with the suggestion to go the nviz
> > directory and execute make. Upon doing that I get the following error.
> > 
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a(glxcmds.o)(.text+0x2eea): In function `glXGetMscRateOML':
> > : undefined reference to `XF86VidModeQueryVersion'
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a(glxcmds.o)(.text+0x2f1a): In function `glXGetMscRateOML':
> > : undefined reference to `XF86VidModeGetModeLine'
> 
> Try to figure out why you don't have a shared libGL.
> 
> Recent Xorg versions of libGL depend upon libXxf86vm. If you had a
> shared libGL (libGL.so), it would have dependency information which
> would cause libXxf86vm to be linked automatically, e.g.:
> 
> 	$ ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
> 	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x40079000)
> 	libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x400cc000)
> 	libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x400d2000)
> 	libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400e0000)
> 	libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x401a9000)
> 	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x401ad000)
> 	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
> 
> Static libraries don't include dependency information.
> 
> Note to developers: the libGL check in configure.in should probably be
> updated to try using -lXxf86vm if the initial attempt fails.
> 
> -- 
> Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
Thanks.

I have libGL.so (and family) in the following locations:
/usr/lib/debug/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib/debug/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/lib/libGL.so
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.0.7174
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa
/usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa
/usr/local/FWTools-linux-0.9.5/lib/Mesa/libGL.so
/usr/local/FWTools-linux-0.9.5/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1
/usr/local/FWTools-linux-0.9.5/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1.2.030402
/usr/local/openev/lib/Mesa/libGL.so
/usr/local/openev/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1
/usr/local/openev/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1.4.050002
/usr/local/openevsrc/Linux/lib/Mesa/libGL.so
/usr/local/openevsrc/Linux/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1
/usr/local/openevsrc/Linux/lib/Mesa/libGL.so.1.4.050002
/usr/X11R6/lib/debug/libGL.so.1
/usr/X11R6/lib/debug/libGL.so.1.2
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so
/usr/X11R6/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa
/usr/X11R6/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa

Now if I run ldd on either the libGL.so in /usr/X11R6/lib or /usr/lib I get the following.
> ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so
ldd: /usr/lib/libGL.so: No such file or directory

But if I run ldd on libGL.so.1 I get the following:
> ldd /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
                libGLcore.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 (0xb7821000)
        libnvidia-tls.so.1 => /usr/lib/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1 (0xb781f000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb77fc000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb77ef000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb772a000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7727000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb75f2000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)

I've got an nvidia card. Does this affect my library setup such that I can't compile NVIZ properly? I found a binary version of GRASS 6.0 today and that works fine. So I guess I don't really need to resolve the compile issue, but I'm curious and would like to figure out why it didn't work, as I had problems with compiling NVIZ in the past with earlier versions of GRASS.

T
-- 
Trevor Wiens
twiens at spacelan.ne.jp

The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge.
(Daniel J. Boorstin)




More information about the grass-user mailing list