[GRASSLIST:10289] Re: ps.map resolution

[Tom Russo]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:06:20AM +0000, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <glynn at gclements.plus.com> flavor, containing:
> 
> Tom Russo wrote:
> 
> > Back in October there was a discussion of how ps.map had a hard coded 
> > setting of 75DPI for its output, and a bit of a discussion of fixing that.
> > 
> > I just spent a bunch of time trying to make postscript map files of some
> > fairly high-quality map scans, only to have them come out looking blotchy.  
> > Only just now did I remember this discussion and look it up in my mail archives.
> > 
> > Has there been any more thought about how to do away with this hard-coded 
> > limit in ps.map?  The temporary solution is to rebuild ps.map with a 
> > different, higher hardcoded resolution, which is icky, to say the least (but 
> > easy, and that's what I did).
> 
> Sorry, I didn't realise it was still there. The latest CVS version no
> longer downsamples raster maps.

Thanks, that worked great.

-- 
Tom Russo    KM5VY     SAR502  DM64ux         http://www.swcp.com/~russo/
Tijeras, NM  QRPL#1592 K2#398  SOC#236 AHTB#1 
"And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is
 one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh,
 oooh, the sky is the limit."  --- The Tick