[GRASS-user] Re: GRASS and ABM
Michael Barton
michael.barton at asu.edu
Fri Feb 15 10:26:36 EST 2008
On Feb 15, 2008, at 6:38 AM, grass-user-request at lists.osgeo.org wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:41:15 +0000
> From: Roy Sanderson <r.a.sanderson at newcastle.ac.uk>
> Subject: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 22, Issue 35
> To: grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> Message-ID: <1203061275.28165.310.camel at clarinet>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Dear Michael
>
> That's great - I wasn't aware of these two sites which are both really
> helpful and I'll follow them through. The issue on GRASS's
> scriptability is something of a double-edged sword in that it makes it
> much simpler to develop models in various languages and call them
> inside
> the script, but then there often seems to be a performance hit in
> terms
> of CPU or file IO. The permutation testing that goes with the
> sensitivity analysis of many ABMs probably accentuates this issue.
> Perhaps linkage through the new GRASS Extension Manager might speed up
> processing a little, but I suspect it's more a case of revisiting some
> of my coding, to make it a little less clumsy! Judging by the
> number of
> pdfs on agent-based models on your site, I've a lot of reading to
> catch
> up on.
It's a fast moving target.
>
> What's the relationship between the openabm list and the grass-abm one
> hosted at osgeo which I've just stumbled across? The activity on the
> latter does, unfortunately, seem fairly low.
The grass-abm list at osgeo was started when we were in the planning
stages for the NSF-funded workshop that launched OpenABM. OpenABM is
generic to ABM related issues; grass-abm is specific to GRASS and
ABM. I'd like to see more traffic on both.
Michael
More information about the grass-user
mailing list