[GRASS-user] differences between GDAL Grass built-in support and GDAL-Grass plugin

[Benjamin Ducke]

Does that mean that circular dependency has finally been dropped?
Unless one really needs r.out.gdal.sh?
How about OGR?

Ben

Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> concerning just GRASS, GDAL with GRASS support has been required just
> for old r.out.gdal script (now r.out.gdal.sh). Since this module is
> now written in C (>=6.3), GDAL doesn't require GRASS support to run
> r.out.gdal.
> 
> Martin
> 
> 2008/7/9 G. Allegri <giohappy at gmail.com>:
>> Thanks Tom.
>> Ok. I had already built Grass on GDAL from repo. Then I needed ecw
>> support so I built my own GDAL (it could see the already installed
>> Grass, so I've asked Grass support), and then I've built Grass against
>> my new GDAL...
>>
>> So, the use of GDAL-Grass plugin is needed to avoid circular
>> dependency, but there aren't differences in funtionality, speed, etc.
>> Right?
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-user mailing list
>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Benjamin Ducke
Senior Applications Support and Development Officer

Oxford Archaeological Unit Limited
Janus House
Osney Mead
OX2 0ES
Oxford, U.K.

Tel: +44 (0)1865 263 800 (switchboard)
Tel: +44 (0)1865 980 758 (direct)
Fax :+44 (0)1865 793 496
benjamin.ducke at oxfordarch.co.uk




------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit http://iso26300.info for more information.