[GRASS-user] buffer on granular polygon... it fails
Nikos Alexandris
nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de
Wed Mar 12 23:23:54 EDT 2008
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:08 -0700, Hamish wrote:
> > Hamish wrote:
> > > v.buffer has some problems,
> > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/90
> > >
> > > It's not a perfect solution but maybe try v.to.rast + r.buffer +
> > > r.to.vect ?
>
> Nikos:
> > In general I try to avoid rasterising of vectors, do something and
> > then vectorise back.
>
> it's not a great solution, but it is perhaps better than having output
> with incorrect gaps.
>
>
> > It's off topic but I have a question: what's
> > the deal concerning loss off information/ distortion etc. ? On which
> > factors it depends most? Resolution?
>
> resolution + rasterization method.
>
> you can minimize resolution issues by making the resolution as fine as
> practicable; see the v.to.rast module help page for information on the
> different methods depending on feature type.
>
>
> Hamish
Thank you Hamish!
More information about the grass-user
mailing list