Positive reproducibility with spearfish - Re: [GRASS-user] v.buffer segmentation fault

[Corrado]

Yes it is reproducible with spearfish:

v.buffer input=landcover output=lcb distance=2 --overwrite

Buffering lines...
 100%
Buffering areas...
Segmentation fault
GRASS 6.4.0RC4 (Spearfish60):~ >

It may be a size dependent bug. Small vectors, v.buffer works. Large vectors it 
does not.

On Friday 24 July 2009 11:34:42 Corrado wrote:
> 1) GRASS version: 6.3, 6.4 RC4
> Operating system: Linux Kubuntu 9.04 64 bit, FC 9.0 64 bit, Linux Kubuntu
> 904 32 bit
>
> Which makes me assume this is a bug since the vectors are clean.
>
> Where do I get those datasets?
>
> 2) Yes
>
> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:03:03 you wrote:
> > Corrado Topi wrote:
> > > I have a potential bug here, if everything I do is right.
> > >
> > > I have a vector calledn england.
> > >
> > > I run
> > >
> > > v.buffer input=england output=england_buffer type=area
> > > buffer=1420
> > >
> > > and all I get is segmentation fault.
> >
> > what version of GRASS? what operating system?
> > can you reproduce the bug with the North Carolina or spearfish
> > datasets?
> >
> > > P.S.: I cannot login anymore into the tracker with my ID
> > > (ct529).
> >
> > can you find your login on the find-my-login-id osgeo wiki
> > page? (probably linked from the login/create new account page)
> >
> >
> > Hamish



-- 
Corrado Topi

Global Climate Change & Biodiversity Indicators
Area 18,Department of Biology
University of York, York, YO10 5YW, UK
Phone: + 44 (0) 1904 328645, E-mail: ct529 at york.ac.uk