[GRASS-user] Missing some tools: v.db.addcol, for example

Roger André randre at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 13:52:09 EDT 2009


Hi Markus,

Thanks for your inquiry about this.  Everything works now, after
having moved all scripts from sub-directory into $GISBASE/scripts.
I'm teaching myself how to use GRASS with your excellent book, so I am
far from being an expert at installation and configuration options.
However in response to Nikos's question, I am not sure how changing
permissions would have solved this problem. Following the defined
$PATH would only bring you to the directory, and not the script
itself.  It would seem to me that part of the make process would be to
copy these scripts into the correct directory, but since they appear
to be the same place... I dunno.

Thanks,

Roger
--

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Nikos Alexandris
<nikos.alexandris at felis.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 15:01 +0200, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
>>
>> > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Roger André <randre at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > My PATH while in GRASS already contains the scripts dir:
>> >
>> > > > GRASS 6.4.0RC4 (colombia):~ > echo $PATH
>> > > > /usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/bin:/usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/scripts:<snip>
>> >
>> > Mine too (the grass-6.4.0svn version).
>> >
>> >
>> > > > What I did find is that each script is under a directory by the same
>> > > > name in the scripts dir.  So for example, d.redraw is in:
>> > > > /usr/local/grass-6.4.0RC4/scripts/d.redraw/d.redraw
>> >
>> > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 11:44 +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
>> > > Wow. This is not desired of course. I am a bit surprised.
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:18 +0200, Nikos Alexandris wrote:
>>
>> [Replying to myself]
>>
>> > Maybe I don't get that right but I have grass64_release, grass640_0rc5,
>> > grass6_devel, grass_trunk. In all of them the scripts (sub-)directory
>> > contains a directory for each script. In each script-directory there are
>> > description (html) files and also README, Makefiles, etc.
>> >
>> > Isn't this ok?
>>
>> Yes it is (for the source code :-). Under /usr/local/grass... (the
>> installed stuff; currently I use the 64 version) all scripts are bare
>> files under the scripts directory.
>>
>>
>> > > > I'm going through all of these now, and removing the dir and leaving
>> > > > the script.  Somewhat tedious, but the scripts appear to work.
>> >
>> > > Would you mind to check if this is still valid for RC5?
>
> I've installed grass-6.4.0RC5 and there is no problem. Scripts (all of
> them I suppose seem to) work fine ~ I 've tested several.
>
> Nikos
>
>


More information about the grass-user mailing list