[GRASS-user] r.watershed from Metz et al. Paper in 6.4

[Markus Metz]

stephen sefick wrote:
> Is the r.watershed in 6.4 the one described in the Metz et al. 2010
> paper?

Yes, at least in 6.4.as in svn, not in rc6.

> Should I stay with 6.4 or switch to 7.

Stay with 6.4, but use an up-to-date version. The 7 version differs
only insofar as there is this -b option for all in memory mode and the
disk swap mode is much faster than in 6.4 or 6.5.

Markus M