[GRASS-user] Is r.damflood is suitable for grass6.5

[Margherita Di Leo]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:27 AM, SWAPAN GHOSH <swap.ghsh at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thanks to all for helping me. Later I build Grass7 developement
> environment. At that time I have not much time for research. I can solve my
> requirement using r.lake and r.hazard.flood command.


I would like to point you out that r.hazard.flood follows a completely
different rationale than r.damflood. You can find the details in:

Manfreda, S., M. Di Leo, A. Sole, *Detection of Flood Prone Areas using
Digital Elevation Models*, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering,
(10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000367), 2011.
[pdf]<http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000367>

Di Leo, M., S. Manfreda, M. Fiorentino, *An automated procedure for the
detection of flood prone areas: r.hazard.flood*,Geomatics Workbooks n. 10 -
"FOSS4G-it: Trento 2011", 83-89, 2011
[Link<http://geomatica.como.polimi.it/workbooks/n10/>
].

Anyhow a comparison between the two approaches IMHO would be worthwhile and
I would really appreciate your feedback, since r.hazard.flood is based on
an experimental procedure we developed.

Thank you and best regards,

madi


-- 
Margherita DI LEO
Postdoctoral Researcher
European Commission - DG JRC
Forest Resources and Climate
I-21020 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-leo at jrc.ec.europa.eu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20121109/3f632a08/attachment.html>