[GRASS-user] Query: number of 'areas' reported in v.build output does not necessarily represent different geographical areas
richtcooper at hotmail.com
Wed May 8 21:51:52 PDT 2013
> Does using smaller values improve topology?
The approach I'd take would be to gradually reduce the snapping distanceby a
factor of 10 (e.g., starting at 0.000001) until no changes in topology are
apparent. Then I'd address the minimum size area to be imported to see how
that affects topology.
Unless there is an easier/quicker way?
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Query-number-of-areas-reported-in-v-build-output-does-not-necessarily-represent-different-geographics-tp5052007p5052229.html
Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the grass-user