[GRASS-user] SRTM r.watershed at multiple scales
Michel Wortmann
wortmann at pik-potsdam.de
Fri Feb 21 05:43:19 PST 2014
Thanks Markus and Stefan,
that did make a difference but I think it will always be a bit of a
gamble and a gap filling to match both the catchment with its subbasins
will always be needed.
R,
Michel
On 02/20/2014 10:09 PM, Markus Metz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Lüdtke <sluedtke at gfz-potsdam.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I experienced a similar point, but, if I remember right, this was
>> because I set the computational region to the extend of the catchment
>> produced by r.water.outlet.
> This is correct, r.watershed need a buffer of at least one cell around
> the catchment, otherwise it can not find out where exactly the
> catchment's borders are.
>
> Markus M
>
>
> So maybe the MASK has a similar effect and
>> r.watershed needs kind of buffer. Should be easy to check ...
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 02/20/2014 07:11 PM, Michel Wortmann wrote:
>>> Here is what I think is strange though about your explanation, Markus:
>>> If I first mask a watershed produced with r.water.outlet and then use
>>> r.watershed to produce subbasins, it doesnt include the entire area of
>>> the watershed but leaves small areas out, although these areas belong to
>>> it. Is this a threshold problem?
>>>
>>> Tom, see image attached.
>>>
>>> Michel
>>>
>>> On 02/19/2014 04:42 PM, Thomas Adams wrote:
>>>> I've been using GRASS 7 for this and have not seen a problem -- I hope
>>>> I'm not overlooking the issue. Michel, can you provide an image that
>>>> shows this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014, Michel Wortmann
>>>> <wortmann at pik-potsdam.de <mailto:wortmann at pik-potsdam.de>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Markus,
>>>> last year you asked me whether the r.watershed output is not
>>>> aligned to the r.water.outlet output in GRASS7 (s.b.). Ie. it
>>>> leaves small areas out. Back then, I wasnt using GRASS7, but I can
>>>> confirm now that it still does it and it is still rather annoying.
>>>> Have you ever heard of the reasons or attempted to fix this?
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michel
>>>>
>>>> On 08/26/2013 03:25 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/22/2013 08:52 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Hi Michel,
>>>> >>
>>>> >>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Michel Wortmann
>>>> >><wortmann at pik-potsdam.de> wrote:
>>>> >>...
>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>As the r.watershed algorithm often leaves small
>>>> areas at the edges
>>>> >>>uncovered, you'll have to fill those before or
>>>> after patching, otherwise
>>>> >>>you'll have holes in your subbasin map.
>>>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>... just curious: does this happen still in the latest
>>>> GRASS 7 version?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Markus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> grass-user mailing list
>>>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas E Adams, III
>>>> 718 McBurney Drive
>>>> Lebanon, OH 45036
>>>>
>>>> 1 (513) 739-9512 (cell)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> grass-user mailing list
>>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>>>
>> --
>> Stefan Lüdtke
>>
>> Section 5.4- Hydrology
>> Tel.: +49 331 288 2821
>> Fax: +49 331 288 1570
>> Email: sluedtke at gfz-potsdam.de
>>
>> Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam
>> Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ
>> (GFZ German Research Centre for Geoscience)
>> Stiftung des öff. Rechts Land Brandenburg
>> Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam
>> -------------------
>>
>> PGP Public Key: http://bit.ly/13d9Sca
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-user mailing list
>> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
More information about the grass-user
mailing list