[GRASS-user] r.in.gdal for importing categorical ArcGIS binary rasters

[Vaclav Petras]

Unfortunately, I have data where GDAL does not identify the columns. One is
the only string there, and the other three are the red, green, blue (in the
range 0-1). For me it is clear what column I would like to transform to
label and to color rules but I'm not sure if GDAL has even a chance to
determine it somehow. So, some options to set this would be great.

I can share the data, they are from a public source.

But anyway, connection to color tables and labels is great, colors and
labels solves at least significant part of the cases where raster attribute
tables are used.

Vaclav


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Moritz Lennert <
mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:

> On 21/02/14 17:12, Markus Metz wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Moritz Lennert
>> <mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/02/14 11:30, Markus Metz wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Moritz Lennert
>>>> <mlennert at club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 20/02/14 22:14, Markus Metz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would not replace a working gdal version with a probably not working
>>>>>> gdal version. Your gdalinfo reported a raster attribute table, not
>>>>>> mine. You could double-check again if your gdalinfo still finds a
>>>>>> raster attribute table, then import with r.in.gdal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Out of curiosity: if a table contains several columns which one(s)
>>>>> is/are
>>>>> imported and in what form do they appear in GRASS (I don't have a file
>>>>> here
>>>>> to test myself) ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Each column has a dedicated usage. For "name" usage, the column is
>>>> treated as category labels. For any of the color usages, the column is
>>>> treated as corresponding red, green, or blue color. See also the gdal
>>>> documentation [0]. Currently, r.out.gdal exports category labels or
>>>> color rules to a raster attribute table with the new -t flag, and
>>>> r.in.gdal automatically imports any information it finds.
>>>>
>>>> Markus M
>>>>
>>>> [0] http://www.gdal.org/gdal_8h.html#a27bf786b965d5227da1acc2a4cab69a1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, IIUC you get the GFU_Name and the color information, but if the table
>>> contains several fields (which I guess will be of type GFU_Generic) these
>>> are ignored ?
>>>
>>
>> GFU_Generic usage is ignored because it is unknown what this could be
>> good for.
>>
>
> VAT tables allow as many fields as the user wants, not only a class name.
> But I don't know (and can't tell from ESRI's documentation) whether these
> additional fields will all be considered GFU_Names or GFU_Generics) and as
> I don't have relevant data here (and data that colleagues created for me
> causes an error with gdal...) I can't test this at this stage.
>
> My question was: if a raster has several fields as in the attribute table,
> would it be possible to chose the field to use as labels in GRASS ?
>
> Moritz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20140221/fc8db24b/attachment.html>