[GRASS-user] r.in.gdal and .raw files

[Margherita Di Leo]

Markus,

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Margherita Di Leo <diregola at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Markus Metz
> >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Margherita Di Leo <diregola at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > anyone has experience with .raw files? I happen to have one to analyze
> >> > (quite large indeed) and  r.in.gdal doesn't seem to support it.
> However,
> >> > for some magics, qgis is able to open it and I'm now converting it to
> tif.
>
> ... are you using the same GDAL version in QGIS and GRASS GIS?
>

1.10.1 (2013/08/26)

>
> >> > But it's taking kinda forever. Any better idea?
> >>
> >> A .raw file could be a raw data file from a digital camera, but it can
> >> also be anything else. Can QGIS tell you what kind of file this is?
> >
> > It is mosaic from digital camera (RGB).
>
> But if it is a mosaic, the camera file got already postprocessed?
>

Yes, sorry if I was unclear on this. It comes with its .hdr, in which I
read it's been postprocessed with ENVI. However my curiosity was about qgis
handling it and grass not, using the same version of gdal..


> If not, there are various formats:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raw_image_format#File_contents
>
> ciao
> markusN
>



-- 
Best regards,

Dr. Margherita DI LEO
Scientific / technical project officer

European Commission - DG JRC
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Via Fermi, 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261

Tel. +39 0332 78 3600
margherita.di-leo at jrc.ec.europa.eu

Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not
in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the
European Commission.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20150204/a939d445/attachment-0001.html>