[GRASS-user] Best Raster storage format for huge number of read only access?
Rainer M Krug
Rainer at krugs.de
Mon Nov 2 03:02:29 PST 2015
Hi
I am on an OS X El Capitan.
I have done 530 simulations and each resulted in about 2600 raster maps
(all same projection, three areas).
What is the best way of storing these in a space efficient way and to
have them accessible read-only? I have them at the moment in a grass
database and thought of putting these into a squashfs which should
work, but after two days of compressing (and only having compressed
30% - slow speed presumably due to huge number of files) I gave up.
I would like to avoid having to install postgresql as I tried it before
(several years ago) and given up due to it's complexity.
I will analyse the maps in R, so any storage backend which I can use
From R and GRASS would be OK.
Any suggestions?
Rainer
--
Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany)
Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
Stellenbosch University
South Africa
Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44
Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98
Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44
Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44
email: Rainer at krugs.de
Skype: RMkrug
PGP: 0x0F52F982
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20151102/265d1bef/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list