[GRASS-user] v.proj fails: no shift table [FIXED]
Rich Shepard
rshepard at appl-ecosys.com
Thu Sep 15 08:53:15 PDT 2016
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Markus Neteler wrote:
> Seems we are back on track? Please update and let us know.
Markus,
Yes, we're back on the tracks.
My project's location report:
GRASS 7.3.svn
~/projects/oregon/<proj_name>/data/features > g.proj -pt
-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name : NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Oregon_North_FIPS_3601_Feet_Intl
datum : nad83harn
ellps : grs80
proj : lcc
lat_1 : 44.33333333333334
lat_2 : 46
lat_0 : 43.66666666666666
lon_0 : -120.5
x_0 : 2500000
y_0 : 0
no_defs : defined
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit : Foot
units : Feet
meters : 0.3048
The OpenFileGDB roads location report:
GRASS 7.3.svn (ODOT2014):~/data/grassdata/ODOT2014 > g.proj -pt
-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name : NAD83 / Oregon Lambert (ft)
datum : nad83
ellps : grs80
proj : lcc
lat_1 : 43
lat_2 : 45.5
lat_0 : 41.75
lon_0 : -120.5
x_0 : 399999.9999984
y_0 : 0
no_defs : defined
-PROJ_EPSG-------------------------------------------------
epsg : 2992
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit : foot
units : feet
meters : 0.3048
And v.proj run from the project location has no complaints about
transforming projection data from the source location.
The state is supposed to have a single projection so it's interesting to
learn that map sets from two different state agencies have slightly
different parameters.
I don't mind testing in the corners of the development (trunk) branch.
Thanks to Even, Martin, and you for taking the time to patch things,
Rich
More information about the grass-user
mailing list