[GRASS-user] v.proj fails: no shift table [FIXED]

Rich Shepard rshepard at appl-ecosys.com
Thu Sep 15 08:53:15 PDT 2016


On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Markus Neteler wrote:

> Seems we are back on track? Please update and let us know.

Markus,

   Yes, we're back on the tracks.

   My project's location report:

GRASS 7.3.svn
~/projects/oregon/<proj_name>/data/features > g.proj -pt
-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name       : NAD_1983_HARN_StatePlane_Oregon_North_FIPS_3601_Feet_Intl
datum      : nad83harn
ellps      : grs80
proj       : lcc
lat_1      : 44.33333333333334
lat_2      : 46
lat_0      : 43.66666666666666
lon_0      : -120.5
x_0        : 2500000
y_0        : 0
no_defs    : defined
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit       : Foot
units      : Feet
meters     : 0.3048

   The OpenFileGDB roads location report:

GRASS 7.3.svn (ODOT2014):~/data/grassdata/ODOT2014 > g.proj -pt
-PROJ_INFO-------------------------------------------------
name       : NAD83 / Oregon Lambert (ft)
datum      : nad83
ellps      : grs80
proj       : lcc
lat_1      : 43
lat_2      : 45.5
lat_0      : 41.75
lon_0      : -120.5
x_0        : 399999.9999984
y_0        : 0
no_defs    : defined
-PROJ_EPSG-------------------------------------------------
epsg       : 2992
-PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------
unit       : foot
units      : feet
meters     : 0.3048

   And v.proj run from the project location has no complaints about
transforming projection data from the source location.

   The state is supposed to have a single projection so it's interesting to
learn that map sets from two different state agencies have slightly
different parameters.

   I don't mind testing in the corners of the development (trunk) branch.

Thanks to Even, Martin, and you for taking the time to patch things,

Rich



More information about the grass-user mailing list