[GRASS-user] i.atcorr with Sentinel2
Markus Metz
markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com
Thu Dec 21 01:25:08 PST 2017
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Stefan Blumentrath <
Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no> wrote:
>
> Thanks Markus,
>
> As a next try I updated my gcc and g++ to 5.4.1 (on Ubuntu 14.04) and I
applied your compiler flags, Markus.
> Unfortunately, I still get only NULL cells in i.atcorr output…
>
> Will try to test more recent OS (Ubuntu 16) and maybe get a Fedora live
system…
i.atcorr should produce identical results on all supported systems. These
differences are a mystery to me. For a start, compiler warnings could be
solved and the valgrind warnings need to be checked.
Markus M
>
> Cheers
> Stefan
>
> From: Markus Metz [mailto:markus.metz.giswork at gmail.com]
> Sent: onsdag 20. desember 2017 22.52
> To: Moritz Lennert <mlennert at club.worldonline.be>
> Cc: Stefan Blumentrath <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no>; Sajid Pareeth <
spareeth at gmail.com>; GRASS user list <grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] i.atcorr with Sentinel2
>
> Adding to the confusion. I used
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Moritz Lennert <
mlennert at club.worldonline.be<mailto:mlennert at club.worldonline.be>> wrote:
> >
> > On 19/12/17 15:24, Stefan Blumentrath wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> In case someone would be willing to test my data (which I would be
very grateful for), you can get it directly here:
> >>
> >> dem: http://www.filedropper.com/dem_1
> >>
> >> S2 band 8:
http://www.filedropper.com/s2aoperprdmsil1cpdmc20160907t044118r008v20160905t10402220160905t104245b08
> >>
> >> 62 params: http://www.filedropper.com/p6s
> with latest 7.4 and 7.5, command is
>
> i.atcorr in=b08 range=1,28001 elevation=dem parameters=p6s.txt
out=b08_atcorr
>
> and I get reasonable results:
>
> r.info<http://r.info> -r b08_atcorr_g74
> min=0.003231863
> max=255
>
> r.info<http://r.info> -r b08_atcorr_g75
> min=0.003231863
> max=255
> my OS is Fedora 27 with compiler gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat
7.2.1-2)
> relevant compiler flags are
> -g -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wshadow -Wno-sign-compare -fno-common
-fexceptions -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-O3 -fno-fast-math
>
> -fno-fast-math might be important
>
> running i.atcorr through valgrind, I get lots of warnings like
>
> ==14080== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==14080== at 0x42B18D: os(float, float, float, float, float, float (&)
[51][49], Gauss&, Altitude const&, GeomCond const&) (computations.cpp:831)
> ==14080== by 0x42E9E3: atmref(float, float, float, float, float,
OpticalAtmosProperties&, Gauss&, GeomCond const&, AerosolModel const&,
Altitude const&) (computations.cpp:1408)
> ==14080== by 0x42FCBC: discom(GeomCond const&, AtmosModel const&,
AerosolModel const&, AerosolConcentration const&, Altitude const&, IWave
const&) (computations.cpp:1654)
> ==14080== by 0x40C032: init_6S(char*) (6s.cpp:100)
> ==14080== by 0x405A3C: main (main.cpp:618)
> ...
> later on
>
> ==14080== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==14080== at 0x42DED8: iso(float, float, float, float, float, float
(&) [3], Gauss&, Altitude const&) (computations.cpp:1262)
> ==14080== by 0x42F011: scatra(float, float, float, float, float,
OpticalAtmosProperties&, Gauss&, GeomCond const&, Altitude const&)
(computations.cpp:1578)
> ==14080== by 0x42FD08: discom(GeomCond const&, AtmosModel const&,
AerosolModel const&, AerosolConcentration const&, Altitude const&, IWave
const&) (computations.cpp:1659)
> ==14080== by 0x406882: pre_compute_h(float) (6s.cpp:148)
> ==14080== by 0x406372: process_raster (main.cpp:369)
> ==14080== by 0x406372: main (main.cpp:632)
> ...
> IMHO, these valgrind warnings need to be investigated.
> Markus M
>
> >>
> >
> > Just a very quick test, in 7.4 RC1, using
> >
> > i.atcorr in=b08 range=1,28001 elevation=dem
parameters=BROL/STEFAN/p6s.txt out=b08_atcorr
> >
> > gives
> >
> > r.info<http://r.info> -r b08_atcorr
> > min=-nan
> > max=-nan
> >
> > So I can confirm that there seems to be a problem.
> > Don't have much time to do more testing.
> >
> > A bug report with example data would probably be warranted.
> >
> > Moritz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grass-user mailing list
> > grass-user at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:grass-user at lists.osgeo.org>
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20171221/f106a0a4/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list