[GRASS-user] r.watershed / r.terraflow - huge area (amazon)
Carlos Grohmann
carlos.grohmann at gmail.com
Tue Jan 10 03:30:55 PST 2017
Hello all
I'm working on deriving a nice drainage network for the Amazon basin. The
problem is that the area is too large.
The region settings are these:
projection: 3 (Latitude-Longitude)
zone: 0
datum: wgs84
ellipsoid: wgs84
north: 6:17N
south: 21:30S
west: 80:37W
east: 44:50W
nsres: 0:00:03
ewres: 0:00:03
rows: 33340
cols: 42940
cells: 1431619600
With 14.3 billion cels, r.watershed would need about 450 GiB of disk space
running in seg mode, is that correct? (from the manual, 31 MB for 1 million
cells).
I do have that disk space available, but it's in a secondary drive. If I
set TMPDIR to that drive, will r/watershed use it? I ask because the
documentation (https://grass.osgeo.org/grass72/manuals/variables.html) only
says that this environmental variable is used by "[Various GRASS GIS
commands and wxGUI]".
On a side note, r.terraflow should be an alternative for such a large
dataset, but from the manual:
"r.terraflow has a limit on the number of rows and columns (max 32,767
each)".
That's the size of a positive short integer. Is this limit still needed?
thanks
Carlos
--
Prof. Carlos Henrique Grohmann
Institute of Energy and Environment - Univ. of São Paulo, Brazil
- Digital Terrain Analysis | GIS | Remote Sensing -
http://carlosgrohmann.com
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-5572
________________
Can’t stop the signal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-user/attachments/20170110/74c970b8/attachment.html>
More information about the grass-user
mailing list